Low back pain is one of the most common health problems in the world, yet it remains one of the most poorly understood. Nearly everyone knows someone who struggles with it, or struggles with it themselves. It interrupts work, sleep, recreation, exercise, and family life. It forces people to stop doing things they enjoy and, in many cases, reshapes how they move through the world. What makes low back pain especially frustrating is not just the pain itself, but the lack of lasting answers. Many people are told their pain is “nonspecific,” “mechanical,” or simply part of aging. Others are reassured that their imaging looks normal, even though their symptoms persist. Some are given short-term solutions that help temporarily but fail to prevent recurrence.
Research tells us something important and often overlooked: most low back pain is not caused by catastrophic damage, irreversible degeneration, or something that must be endured indefinitely. Instead, the majority of low back pain is related to how the spine is functioning, how forces are distributed, and how the nervous system is responding to altered spinal mechanics.
This distinction matters. When low back pain is approached as a functional spinal problem rather than a purely symptomatic condition, the strategy changes. Chiropractic care is built around this functional model, and the research base supporting chiropractic care for low back pain is substantial.
Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Read that again.
The Global Burden of Disease Study, published in The Lancet, identified low back pain as the number one cause of years lived with disability across all regions, sexes, and age groups. This places low back pain ahead of heart disease, diabetes, depression, and cancer in terms of its impact on daily function and quality of life.
Epidemiological studies estimate that up to 80% of adults will experience low back pain at some point in their lives. For many, the problem does not resolve permanently. Recurrence rates are high, particularly when care focuses only on symptom reduction rather than addressing underlying spinal dysfunction.
The societal cost of low back pain is enormous, encompassing healthcare utilization, lost productivity, disability claims, and long-term dependence on medications. Despite this investment, outcomes remain inconsistent, suggesting that the prevailing approach often fails to address the true driver of the condition.
Approximately 85–90% of low back pain cases are classified as nonspecific. This label is widely misunderstood.
“Nonspecific” does not mean:
It simply means that imaging does not reveal fracture, infection, tumor, inflammatory disease, or other serious pathology requiring emergency intervention.
Research consistently shows that nonspecific low back pain is associated with:
These are functional problems, not structural destruction. They affect how the spine moves, how forces are transmitted, and how sensory information is processed by the nervous system. Importantly, they often do not appear on standard imaging.
This is a critical point: absence of findings on MRI or X-ray does not mean absence of dysfunction.
The lumbar spine is a complex, adaptive system designed to:
Normal spinal function depends on coordinated movement between joints, balanced muscular control, and appropriate neurological input. When even one spinal segment loses normal motion or mechanical integrity, the rest of the system must compensate.
These compensations may include:
Initially, these adaptations may be helpful. Over time, however, they can become inefficient and lead to pain, stiffness, and reduced tolerance to physical activity. Pain often appears after these compensations have been present for some time, making it a late-stage indicator rather than an early warning sign.
One of the most common frustrations for people with low back pain is being told their imaging looks “normal” or shows findings that “don’t explain the pain.”
This disconnect is well documented in the scientific literature.
A landmark systematic review by Brinjikji and colleagues, published in the American Journal of Neuroradiology, examined MRI findings in asymptomatic individuals. The study found that disc bulges, disc degeneration, and other structural changes are extremely common in people without pain, and their prevalence increases steadily with age.
Conversely, many people with significant low back pain demonstrate minimal or no abnormalities on imaging.
These findings reinforce an important principle: structural appearance does not reliably predict pain. Function matters more than anatomy alone. Imaging is valuable for ruling out serious pathology, but it is a poor standalone tool for explaining most cases of low back pain.
Pain is not produced by tissues alone. It is an experience generated by the nervous system based on sensory input, context, and prior adaptation.
When spinal joints do not move normally:
Over time, the nervous system adapts to these altered inputs. In some cases, these adaptations contribute to persistent or recurrent pain, even in the absence of tissue damage.
Chiropractic care is designed to influence this process by restoring normal spinal joint motion and mechanical integrity, thereby improving the quality of sensory input reaching the nervous system.
Low back pain is one of the most extensively studied conditions in chiropractic research, and the evidence base is robust.
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines recognize spinal manipulation, including chiropractic care, as an appropriate first-line treatment for low back pain.
The American College of Physicians’ guideline, published in Annals of Internal Medicine, recommends spinal manipulation for both acute and chronic low back pain prior to escalation to pharmacologic or invasive interventions. This recommendation is based on systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials.
The UK BEAM Trial, published in the British Medical Journal, is one of the most influential randomized controlled trials in this field. The study compared spinal manipulation, exercise, and standard medical care for low back pain.
Key findings included:
The UK BEAM Trial helped establish spinal manipulation as an evidence-supported intervention for low back pain within mainstream clinical guidelines.
Long-term outcomes are particularly important in a condition known for recurrence.
A series of landmark randomized trials by Meade and colleagues, published in the British Medical Journal, compared chiropractic care with hospital outpatient management for low back pain. These studies demonstrated:
These findings are notable because long-term improvement is uncommon when care focuses solely on symptom suppression.
Beyond clinical outcomes, research consistently shows high patient satisfaction with chiropractic care for low back pain.
A study by Goertz and colleagues, published in Spine, found that chiropractic care was associated with:
These findings suggest chiropractic care may offer both clinical and economic advantages in managing low back pain.
Chiropractic care differs from many other approaches in its emphasis on:
Rather than focusing solely on pain relief, chiropractic care evaluates how the spine is functioning as a system. When dysfunction is identified, specific chiropractic adjustments are used to restore motion, reduce mechanical stress, and support healthier neurological signaling.
This approach aligns directly with what research tells us about nonspecific low back pain: it is most often functional, mechanical, and adaptable.
A chiropractic evaluation is appropriate when:
Early evaluation may reduce the risk of chronicity by addressing dysfunction before compensatory patterns become deeply ingrained.
Chiropractic care is:
Chiropractic care is not:
Low back pain is not something you simply have to “manage” forever.
If your pain is related to how your spine is functioning—and research shows that this is often the case—addressing that function matters.
Schedule a chiropractic evaluation to determine whether spinal dysfunction is contributing to your low back pain and to develop a care plan grounded in research, not guesswork.
2920 S Webster Ave #100
Green Bay, WI 54301
